If you read LTH poster Leah Z or even spend a modicum of time around GWiv, you know about his 5 step theory. The idea that you learn BBQing via the easy chicken, move up through ribs and pork and finally graduate to brisket. If you know me, or spend a modicum of time around me, you will not be surprised to hear that I disagree with that. I have a much easier time with brisket than ribs.
The only time I ran into real trouble with brisket was the first time I threw 3 full, packer cut, briskets on the grill for a Chowhound event at Inspiration Cafe. I wildy underestimated the amount of heat needed to cook all of that meat. With some advice from the Q savant himself, I learned to up the heat, and since then I've presented people several wonderful hunks of cow belly. Ribs, on the other hand...
On Monday I totally smoked, that is with all off-set heat, no flames under the ribs, several slabs. The results were good but flawed. Overall, I give myself about a 7.5 on a 1-10 scale. Really, this stems from some slabs being close to ideal, say a 9 and one slab that got singed from a flame-up at about a 4--so 7.5 is the average of all the slabs. Still, I find ribs a lot more tricky than brisket. Brisket allows more mistakes. If you burn a corner it actually still tastes good. Burnt ribs never taste good. The bottom line for me, brisket with its larger mass, just gives you a lot more meat to work with. Also, if you use the kind of off-set cooker I do, you got to pay a lot more attention to positioning of the ribs, moving them around a fair amount so they cook even. I turn around the brisket maybe once the whole time.
So what do others think is easier: ribs or brisket?
Rob
Last edited by
Vital Information on June 2nd, 2004, 1:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.