trpt2345 wrote:Consistently excellent food, with superb service and a great atmosphere.
G Wiv wrote:trpt2345 wrote:Consistently excellent food, with superb service and a great atmosphere.
Trpt,
I've not had a chance to try Mixteco, care to offer a few specifics beyond excellent, superb, great as to why you feel Mixteco should be awarded a LTHForum GNR.
Thanks, I'm looking forward to trying Mixteco.
Enjoy,
Gary
Vital Information wrote:Interesting comment. Maybe this has been hashed out before, but is it critical that the nominator make an impassioned nomminating plea? Do they have to say much beyond, "here's a good one" with appropriate evidence of Board support and spirit (the links). The linked thread pretty much speaks for itself, with such solid praise for this place. This surely seems like a captured the imagination of LTH kinda place. Is more needed?
G Wiv wrote:trpt2345 wrote:Consistently excellent food, with superb service and a great atmosphere.
Trpt,
I've not had a chance to try Mixteco, care to offer a few specifics beyond excellent, superb, great as to why you feel Mixteco should be awarded a LTHForum GNR.
Thanks, I'm looking forward to trying Mixteco.
Enjoy,
Gary
stevez wrote:If you look at past nominating threads, you'll see that generally the nominator lays out the charms of a given place and fleshes the post out with some details for those who might not be familiar with the restaurant.
Mike G wrote:It's also your chance to say something that stands a very good chance of winding up on the certificate. In fact, for some places a pithy summing-up is fairly desperately needed for that purpose...
dicksond wrote:1. A member must like a place enough to deem it worthy and to nominate it.
2. Enough other members must also find the place of interest to go there and post on it.
3. The overall consensus as expressed in the posts must be that the place is pretty good.
That does not mean the place is the best of its kind, or that everyone loves it, just that it is of interest to enough members, and that almost all of those members have a favorable opinion of the place.
G Wiv wrote:I'll go back for mid week lunch, but on first blush I do not see the beauty in Mixteco.
stevez wrote:Didn't I read somewhere that Raul Arreola has left the restaurant? Has anyone been there since the change in chefs?
I've enjoyed Raul Arreola's food on many occasions, but never while he actually was cooking it.
The Frontera Grill alum doesn't stay in one spot very long, though his restaurants (and recipes) remain. By the time I got around to reviewing Fonda Del Mar in Logan Square, Arreola was gone, his partners nevertheless doing a fine job with Arreola's dishes, plus many of their own (they've since relocated Fonda Del Mar to North Center).
Arreola then opened Mixteco Grill, a BYO on the north edge of Lakeview, and then, with different partners, opened Rustico Grill, back in Logan Square, in August. A couple of months ago, Arreola took an extended absence for medical reasons, and he recently informed both sets of partners that he wasn't returning.
gastro gnome wrote:Mixteco is my go-to for variety Mexcian from all the Bahena and Bayless alumni. When out-of-towners ask for Mexican recommendations, I try to steer them here rather than Frontera.
dicksond wrote:gastro gnome wrote:Mixteco is my go-to for variety Mexcian from all the Bahena and Bayless alumni. When out-of-towners ask for Mexican recommendations, I try to steer them here rather than Frontera.
I have engaged in the old ABF (anywhere but Frontera) tactic, as well. People coming to Chicago, heard all these wonderful things about Rick Bayless (mostly true and well-deserved) and the first words from my mouth are something like, "Well, Frontera is a very good restaurant and Rick has done a great service to regional Mexican cuisine, but honestly there are so many other places in Chicago with more focus, just as interesting and high quality food, much easier to get into and on the pocket book, that I rarely go to Frontera any more."
dansch wrote:Anyone else been recently? I see gastro gnome's very recent visit was positive, and a number of other endorsements, though without any indication of how recent the visits were.
dansch wrote:Anyone else been recently?
It's quite possible it was an off night, which is why I was cautious to post, but given the news about Chef Arreola's now-permanent departure, I thought it worth bringing up. Without the same chef at the helm things don't necessarily go downhill, but they certainly can get less consistent.aschie30 wrote:Unless something has changed drastically in the kitchen over the last three weeks, maybe they just had an off-night?
dansch wrote:It's quite possible it was an off night, which is why I was cautious to post, but given the news about Chef Arreola's now-permanent departure, I thought it worth bringing up. Without the same chef at the helm things don't necessarily go downhill, but they certainly can get less consistent.aschie30 wrote:Unless something has changed drastically in the kitchen over the last three weeks, maybe they just had an off-night?
-Dan