As someone who has only eaten from the Evanston Hecky's on one or two occasions (good, not great was my impression), and who is a noob when it comes to both BBQ and fried chicken, a couple of things occurred to me while reading all of the comments above. First, I reread the GNR guidelines, and the leading sentence seemed relevant:
"The Great Neighborhood Restaurants Program is designed to recognize local restaurants that the LTH community considers “great” – in other words, places that provide a food experience that is distinctly “better than the rest."
Subsequently, there was one question that kept running through my mind:
If this were not the venerated Evanston stalwart
Hecky's, but rather an identical restaurant in an identical location with identical service and identical food but a different name, would it be under consideration?
To be clear, I'm really not in a good position to be answering this question. And I may be completely misreading, but I get the feeling that for some, Hecky's is being discussed less because it's a Great Neighborhood Restaurant, and more because it's Hecky's. The consensus seems to be that there's better BBQ to be had... much better, in fact. Precedent seems to indicate that
excellent food is not a GNR prerequisite, as long as the grub is great (or perhaps even above average). But in the latter cases it seems as though there's always something unique or special... unusual specialties, exceptional character, etc... that, in conjunction with the food, makes the place worthy. In the case of Hecky's, that something may very well be the fried chicken (which I've never had), but in the end, I get the feeling that the support for Hecky's seems more obligatory than enthusiastic.
Dominic Armato
Dining Critic
The Arizona Republic and
azcentral.com