Mhays wrote:One would assume that if soil/water could support life, it's at least a good start
Octarine wrote:My best friend in HS had a vegetable plot till the mom tested the soil. I turns out that this area was a staging ground for the construction of the el tracks in Evanston back at the turn of the century and the ground was loaded with lead and other nasties. They had a company come and take out many cubic yards of earth (8' down IIRC) and put in new topsoil. It cost a pretty penny back in 1986.
jimswside wrote:With the above said I will not plant vegetables on my property(we have about an acre) for the next couple of years due to the water supply in the town I live in having higher than acceptable levels of radium in the water at certain times of the year.
JoelF wrote:jimswside wrote:With the above said I will not plant vegetables on my property(we have about an acre) for the next couple of years due to the water supply in the town I live in having higher than acceptable levels of radium in the water at certain times of the year.
Don't sweat the radon. It's (a) harmless if swallowed, only harmful if breathed; (b) if you're pouring water on the plants, most of the radon will go into the air, not the plants, (c) it isn't absorbed by the plants either -- it doesn't react with anything.
Your biggest danger from radon is something like a washing machine, that agitates water in an enclosed space, causing the radon to go into the air in the room.
JoelF wrote:My mistake -- radium is a horse of a different color. I admit to not reading carefully.
Ann Fisher wrote:When we moved into our house in Oak Park there was a lovely big raised garden by the alley at the back of the lot. I grew vegetables there for several years before it occurred to me that the raised beds were on top of what had once been gravel parking spaces. The thought of all those years of cars parked there helped convince me to buy my fresh produce at the farmers' market instead.
jimswside wrote:In regards to the comment about the soil being able to sustain life, I wouldnt use that as a gauge for how edible the items may be. I just saw a documentary recently on the areas surrounding Chernoble, and the wildlife, and vegetation is thriving to the surpirse of scientists. But the area is still highly contaminated, and will be for generations.
Cathy2 wrote:jimswside wrote:In regards to the comment about the soil being able to sustain life, I wouldnt use that as a gauge for how edible the items may be. I just saw a documentary recently on the areas surrounding Chernoble, and the wildlife, and vegetation is thriving to the surpirse of scientists. But the area is still highly contaminated, and will be for generations.
I have the dubious distinction of having visited Chernobyl about 15 months after their disaster. The trees had leaves, gardens were overrun with unmaintain vegetation and birds flew around. Everything was visually normal, you just couldn't handle anything. The buildings I was in had heavy acrylic-type plastic molded to the floors and up the ceiling beyond my range to touch. This was a ghost town with just the caretakers roaming about.
In Moscow, the farmer's markets all had Geiger counters to scan food that originated in the Ukraine. They were especially leary of wild mushrooms.
Regards,