Pauly wrote:I tried one at M burger.It wasn't bad,the way M burger cooked it kinda threw me off.They griddle cooked it like a Steak and Shake/Edzos burger so there was a sear on both sides and no reddish moisture inside.Oh,and it was $8.99 before tax so No.Rather get the double M burger or a single w fries if I'm paying $10.09 after tax.Might get a pack at Jewel and cook one myself if there is a coupon though.
BR wrote:I'd say there are some vegetable burgers out there that, while not beefy tasting, taste much better.
Binko wrote:BR wrote:I'd say there are some vegetable burgers out there that, while not beefy tasting, taste much better.
Which are these? I've been wanting to find meat alternatives for myself, and I don't hold a premium for it tasting like meat, or anything like that. I want it to taste good. I mean, I like most of the shit* Morning Star puts out, for reference.
*colloquial "shit." It's good stuff.
Pauly wrote:I thought I saw on Impossible burgers website that the product was available at select grocers Jewel being one of them.Have not tried beyond burger as of yet.
Pauly wrote:Okay Thanks.Maybe it was for beyond burger that I saw was available.Speaking of smell when I opened the wrapper and parchment at M burger the first thing I smelled was the smell of peanut.
Cathy2 wrote:I brought Mom to White Castle to give an impossible burger a try.
I informed Mom, can you believe there is no meat in this? No.
I then pointed to the classic White Castle burger, do you believe there is meat in that? Nope.
You have to get up early to fool my Mom!
Cathy2 wrote:What would be interesting for a true side-by-side comparison: prepare the impossible burger in the very same style as a slider.
Regards,
Cathy2
Binko wrote:I personally prefer it to Beyond Burger which has a certain, I dunno, fishiness to it? I know it's not fish, but that's the best I can describe the scent I detect. But Beyond Burger is pretty neat, too, as a meat substitute. Problem is, I've never been able to taste them side by side in the exact same preparation to form a more fair analysis of their flavors.
Binko wrote:Cathy2 wrote:What would be interesting for a true side-by-side comparison: prepare the impossible burger in the very same style as a slider.
Regards,
Cathy2
I'm curious if that's even practical, given the thinness and texture of the slider. The Impossible Burger is a bit crumbly in the way a good, loosely packed burger is, and I suspect if it's not fried on the flattop to sear the outside and form a crust, some of its "non-meatness" will be more apparent. Just a hunch. I've been tempted to ask if some employee would just sell me the raw "meat" to experiment with, but I suspect with cameras everywhere and corporate policy, I probably couldn't convince one to do so.
seebee wrote:Binko wrote:Cathy2 wrote:What would be interesting for a true side-by-side comparison: prepare the impossible burger in the very same style as a slider.
Regards,
Cathy2
I'm curious if that's even practical, given the thinness and texture of the slider. The Impossible Burger is a bit crumbly in the way a good, loosely packed burger is, and I suspect if it's not fried on the flattop to sear the outside and form a crust, some of its "non-meatness" will be more apparent. Just a hunch. I've been tempted to ask if some employee would just sell me the raw "meat" to experiment with, but I suspect with cameras everywhere and corporate policy, I probably couldn't convince one to do so.
Binko -
I might be able to convince my Impossible purveyor to sneak me some product. I would LOVE to be able to tell them my preferred way that they cook it. Some have been GREAT, with the crumbliness of a loosely packed burger we've both described here, and some have been oddly crumbly/mushy - tho still very good for a meatless burger sub.
Still not sold that there's not gonna be some kind of Soylent Green type issue.
pairs4life wrote:I do feel compelled to order these things when I see them in hopes that they just stay on the menu.